In recent years, our nation has lived through moments when history itself feels unsettled – when the names we have lifted high on buildings, streets and schools are suddenly called into question. We find ourselves wrestling not only with the legacies of great figures but with the uncomfortable truth that greatness and brokenness can sometimes live in the same story. Recent allegations concerning Cesar Chavez have stirred such a moment.
Let me be clear from the outset: If the allegations of sexual abuse are true, they are grievous, painful and wholly unacceptable. There is no moral framework – religious, civic or otherwise – that can excuse harm done to another human being, especially to the vulnerable. As a minister, I have walked alongside survivors of abuse, and I know that such wounds do not fade with time. They linger. They shape lives. They cry out for justice.
And so, I understand why state governments and communities are reconsidering whether Chavez’s name should remain on schools, streets and public holidays. It is a difficult but necessary question. What do we do when a person who stood for justice in one area may have caused harm in another?
Chavez was, without question, a towering figure in the struggle for the dignity of farmworkers. He helped organize laborers who had long been invisible, advocating for safer working conditions, fair wages and basic human respect. For many, especially in Latino communities, his name represents sacrifice, courage and hope.
But if the current allegations bear truth, then we must confront the full weight of that legacy, not just the parts that inspire us, but also the parts that trouble us.
Yet here is where the conversation becomes more complicated and, I would argue, more urgent. If we are to remove Chavez’s name from public honor because of alleged misconduct, then we must ask ourselves: Will we apply that same moral standard consistently?
Because we live in a time when another public figure, Donald Trump, has exhibited serious legal and ethical failures, including a civil court finding holding him liable for sexual abuse. His name adorns buildings, is proposed for institutions and is championed in public life by many who call for moral clarity elsewhere.
So, the question must be asked, plainly and without evasion: If allegations of sexual misconduct disqualify one man from public honor, do they not also call into question the honoring of another?
This is not about political sides. This is about moral consistency. Too often in our national discourse, accountability is demanded of those we are willing to critique, while it is excused or minimized in those we are determined to defend. That is not justice. That is a preference dressed up as a principle.
The danger in selective accountability is that it teaches the next generation that truth is negotiable. That integrity depends on popularity. That character matters only when it is convenient.
As a man of faith, I believe in both accountability and redemption. The Bible is filled with flawed individuals whom God still used for good purposes. But Scripture never calls us to ignore wrongdoing. It calls us to confront it honestly, to seek justice and to walk humbly.
Honoring a person publicly is not the same as acknowledging their contributions historically. Chavez’s work is part of history and we can teach about it without placing his name uncritically in our institutions.
I supported efforts to remove the names of Confederate leaders from monuments of honor in Dallas, not only because they were America’s enemies, but also because of the immorality of their cause. I wouldn’t have integrity myself if I excused sin in Chavez’s case.
But if we are going to remove names, let us do so with integrity. Let us not create a system where some are held accountable, and others are shielded by power, wealth or personal allegiance.
Because the real issue before us is not just Cesar Chavez. It is us. It is whether we, as a nation, dare to apply our values evenly. It is whether we are willing to say that harm is harm, no matter who commits it. It is whether we will build a culture that honors not just achievement, but character.
History is watching how we answer these questions. And more importantly, so are our children. If we want to leave them a legacy worth inheriting, it must be one grounded not in selective memory but in truth.
We welcome your thoughts in a letter to the editor. See the guidelines and submit your letter here.
If you have problems with the form, you can submit via email at letters@dallasnews.com